With modern marriages increasingly involving businesses, ESOPs, inherited wealth, trusts and assets across jurisdictions, there is a strong case for a clear statutory framework rather than leaving the enforceability of prenups uncertain.
The marriage of Portuguese footballer Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodríguez has brought renewed attention to how couples can structure ownership of assets before and during marriage. For couples in Goa, the issue is particularly significant because the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867 continues to govern important aspects of matrimonial property.
The Code recognises different matrimonial property regimes, including separation of assets, allowing spouses to maintain distinct ownership of their respective property.
Why is Goa different from the rest of India?
“Goa, however, is a fascinating exception. Its Portuguese-derived civil law recognises matrimonial property regimes and permits couples, before marriage, to choose arrangements including separation of assets. In that sense, Goa comes considerably closer to the European concept of a separation-of-property prenup,” said Sumit Agrawal, Senior Lawyer, Regstreet Law Advisors & former SEBI Officer.
Goa’s distinct position stems from its Portuguese-era civil law framework, which continues to govern several aspects of civil and matrimonial matters even after the state became part of India.
“Goa stands as India’s sole example of a functioning Uniform Civil Code, applying a common set of civil laws on marriage, divorce, succession, and property to all its residents regardless of religion. This continuity of the Portuguese-era code, preserved even after 1961, offers a real-world template for the national debate on UCC, showing both its feasibility and its limitations, since Goa’s code retains certain community-specific provisions (such as those affecting Catholics) rather than being …
As the UCC debate intensifies nationally, Goa’s decades-long experience provides rare empirical ground for assessing how a common civil code might function across India’s religious and cultural diversity. It remains a frequently cited reference point in Supreme Court judgments and Law Commission reports on the subject, added Shah.
This distinction is important when looking at matrimonial property because Goa’s legal framework allows couples to have greater clarity over how assets are owned and managed within marriage.
This can be particularly relevant for couples who enter marriage with property, investments, businesses or other substantial assets of their own.
Does this mean Goa has a European-style prenup system?
However, the concept should not be understood as a direct Indian equivalent of a celebrity “prenup” governed by Portuguese law.
“For most of India, the answer is nuanced. A couple can enter into a prenuptial agreement recording their understanding on ownership of assets, liabilities and financial arrangements, but India does not have a general statutory framework that gives prenups the same status as matrimonial property agreements in several European jurisdictions. Such an agreement also cannot simply contract out of statutory rights relating to maintenance, matrimonial remedies or succession,” said Agrawal.
In other words, couples can record their financial understanding, but such an agreement cannot automatically override statutory rights or legal protections.
What does Goa’s law allow couples to do?
“In Goa, the applicable matrimonial regime and the formalities for recording or altering it must be examined under the civil law framework applicable to the parties. The significance of this framework is that it provides couples greater clarity on ownership, management and division of assets, particularly where substantial or independently acquired wealth is involved. Thus, while couples in Goa can structure their matrimonial property arrangements, the enforceability and legal effect of any agre…
That makes the choice of matrimonial regime an important consideration for couples seeking clarity over assets acquired before or during marriage.
Why could prenups become a bigger issue in India?
Agrawal said that the larger question for India is whether matrimonial law should evolve to give couples greater freedom to organise their financial affairs before marriage, while preserving safeguards against coercion, inadequate disclosure and waiver of statutory protections. “With modern marriages increasingly involving businesses, ESOPs, inherited wealth, trusts and assets across jurisdictions, there is a strong case for a clear statutory framework rather than leaving the enforceability of p…
As marriages increasingly involve complex assets and wealth spread across businesses and jurisdictions, the debate is shifting from celebrity relationships to a broader question: how should Indian law allow couples to plan ownership and financial arrangements while protecting their legal rights?
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by experts on Moneycontrol.com are their own and not those of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.