BCI rules do not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates or their firms. This website is for information only. See Disclaimer

Delhi High Court Affirms NSE as Public Authority under RTI Act

Featured in
post-img-regstreet

๐ƒ๐ž๐ฅ๐ก๐ข ๐‡๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐š๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐๐’๐„ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐š โ€œ๐๐ฎ๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐œ ๐€๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒโ€ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐“๐ˆ ๐€๐œ๐ญ

A Division Bench of the Honโ€™ble Delhi High Court affirmed and upheld the judgment of the Ld. Single Judge in a Letters Patent Appeal. The matter, originally filed in 2010, concerned the Single Judgeโ€™s decision holding that the NSE India qualifies as a โ€œpublic authorityโ€ under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005-thereby bringing an end to 15 years of litigation since the original 2010 Single Judge ruling.

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ˆ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ž: Can a privately incorporated company be an RTI โ€œpublic authorityโ€ merely because it is recognised as a stock exchange under the SCRA, 1956?

๐Š๐ž๐ฒ ๐…๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ:

1.ย ย ๐ƒ๐ž๐ž๐ฉ & ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐š๐ฌ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ: Relying on Delhi Stock Exchange v. K.C. Sharma (affirmed by the Supreme Court), the Court held SEBI/Central Government exercises deep, pervasive control over recognised exchanges-not mere regulatory oversight. NSEโ€™s attempt to distinguish this precedent as a โ€œservice matterโ€ was rejected.

2.ย ย ๐‘๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง โ‰  ๐ซ๐ž๐ ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: Without SEBIโ€™s recognition order under Section 4 (3) SCRA, NSE could not function as a stock exchange at all. This makes recognition a precondition to its existence-not incidental regulation of an already-functioning private company. That order, being an act of the Central Government (delegated to SEBI under Section 29A SCRA), satisfies the โ€œestablished/constituted by Government orderโ€ limb of Section 2(h).

3.ย ย ๐๐ฎ๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐œ ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ง๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐š๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ฆ๐ž๐: The Court reaffirmed Binny Ltd. v. Sadasivan, which recognises stock exchanges as performing public functions.

4.ย ย NSE was held to qualify as a โ€œpublic authorityโ€ under both limbs of Section 2(h).

๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐ˆ๐ญ ๐Œ๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ: The Court rejected NSEโ€™s โ€œslippery-slopeโ€ argument that this would make banks, NBFCs and insurers public authorities too-distinguishing recognition as a precondition for existence from routine regulatory supervision. The ruling has significant implications for RTI compliance obligations of SCRA-recognised market infrastructure institutions.

A copy of the judgment is attached.

Readers can share their views at info@regstreetlaw.com.

Cateories