In widely worded insider trading law, most cases by the very nature are debatable with implicit subjectivity. There is a considerable debate on when a UPSI comes into existence, if a person is insider and if a trade or communication is based on UPSI. Rightly or wrongly, there is a presumption that all SEBI cases are right. Many cases SEBI win, and many it loses. And many conclude in settlement statistically.
In a Settlement Order, SEBI has disposed of the pending proceedings, against Big Bull of India and 6 others where all 7 noticees paid a collective amount of Rs. 37 crores in settlement, without accepting or denying the facts & conclusions of law. Settlement is a process without admission or denial of anything.
Regstreet Law Advisors Sumit Agrawal a/w Parinam Law Associates Ravichandra Hegde with their respective teams obtained this Settlement Order successfully for the noticees. Securities law enthusiasts must analyze the legality and consequence of a settlement orders on questions of fact and law – which remain open and buried at the same time.
RAKESH JHUNJHUNWALA SETTLEMENT
- By Regstreet Law Advisors
- / July 14, 2021
Featured in
Latest RegPost
Cateories
- Regulators
- Stock Exchanges
- Commodity Exchanges
- Depositories
- Information Utilities
- Banks
- Insurance Companies
- Mutual Funds
- NBFCs
- Credit Rating Companies
- Financial Institutions
- Merchant Banks
- High Net Worth Individuals
- Collective Investment Management Companies
- Web Aggregators (Insurance)
- Alternative Investment Funds
- Repositories
- Listed Companies
- Share Transfer Agents
- Registrar to an Issue
- Underwriters
- Stock Brokers
- Insurance Brokers
- Sub Brokers
- Shareholders
- Depository Participants
- Startups
- Venture Capital Investors
- Investment Banks
- Portfolio Managers
- Investment Advisors
- Research Analysts
- Foreign Portfolio Investors
- Foreign Institutional Investors
- Telecom and Broadcasting Companies
- Private Equity Investors