In today’s The Economic Times article, it was reported that Sumant Kathpalia, former MD & CEO of IndusInd Bank, has offered ₹5.21 crore to settle insider trading charges brought against him by SEBI. The case relates to trading on unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) concerning accounting irregularities, information allegedly known to a select few over a year before disclosure to shareholders and the public.
As per disclosures in the public domain, the concerned individuals reportedly executed trades exceeding ₹100 crore on stock exchanges.
Commenting on the implications of such high-stakes settlements, Mr. Sumit Agrawal, Founder of Regstreet Law Advisors and former SEBI Officer, said in the ET article: “𝘚𝘌𝘉𝘐 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘰𝘳 𝘔𝘍 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵.”
SEBI has reportedly impounded around ₹19.8 crore from five individuals based on notional gains arising from UPSI-based trades. However, it is unclear whether any individual has been permanently barred from accessing the securities markets or associating with listed companies.
This case highlights the evolving nature of SEBI’s settlement regime, and the accompanying tension between regulatory discretion and enforcement transparency. It also revives a strong sentiment expressed by former SEBI Chairman U.K. Sinha, who once likened insider trading to rape in criminal law, emphasizing that SEBI should not be comfortable settling such violations, especially where strong evidence exists.
If settled, this may set a precedent where enforcement and development of insider trading law risk becoming blurred.
The full article is available at https://lnkd.in/gNHu3HYq
Reach out to us at info@regstreetlaw.com
