Mint Newspaper (Neha Joshi) has written a piece on SEBIโs new chairperson, Mr. Tuhin Kanta Pandey, highlighting his remarks at the Moneycontrol-CNBC Global Wealth Summit on transparency, regulatory rationalization, and stakeholder engagement. In this context, Mr. Sumit Agrawal, Founder & Managing Partner of Regstreet Law Advisors, is quoted in Mintโs article titled โ๐๐ฏ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ด๐ฑ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐บ, ๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ต๐ช๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฎ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐จ๐ถ๐ญ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ, ๐ฃ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ด: ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ช๐ด๐ฆ๐ด ๐๐ฆ๐ฃ๐ชโ๐ด ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ธ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ฆ๐ง.โ
Mr. Sumit Agrawal has pointed out existing information gaps such as delayed publication of SEBIโs agenda and stated that while SEBI publishes press releases summarizing board meeting outcomes, the underlying discussions remain largely undisclosed.
Mr. Agrawal emphasized the need for greater transparency in SEBIโs decision-making processes, particularly concerning dissenting opinions and conflict-of-interest disclosures within its board. He stated that past concerns regarding conflicts involving a former chairperson highlight the need for clearer public disclosure of deliberations in such cases. While SEBI does have a code on conflict of interests for board members, but how it is applied in real scenarios remains opaque. Thus, a periodic review and strengthening of this code into a regulation would improve governance at Sebi board meetings.
With respect to optimum regulation, Mr. Agrawal called for a data-driven approach to identifying redundant provisions, advocating for a systematic review of SEBIโs 44 regulations and thousands of circulars. He is of the opinion that a practical approach would be to map each provision based on its actual application in administrative and enforcement actions. Provisions that have remained unused for an extended period should be considered for removal.
Securities law enthusiasts can send their comments to Regstreet Law Advisors at info@regstreetlaw.com
A full text of the article can be accessed at: https://lnkd.in/dtWzQ8V5